Skip to main content

Quota Politics

After supreme court's historical verdict last week,it is now clear that 27 % OBC Quota will be implemented across all state run educational institutes from this year itself.
However one thing which is not clear to me is,when the supreme court categorically told that a bachelor's degree is enough proof that the candidate is not "backward",then how come the quota will be applicable to PG institutes like IIM?

Secondly,while the idea of creamy layer is being debated across all the forums these days,it is largely contained to reserved class candidates!No politician (surprisingly except Mayawati) talks about the "economically backard" criteria!Why can't we have a common criteria for all..the needy and poor students,no matter if they are brahmins or Dalit,should be provided with assistance.Also here are certain aspects of this whole debate I am putting across for larger review.Your comments are most welcome:

1.While it is true that Congress had been a strong supporter of quota politics,have they forgotten the historical speach given by Late PM Mr.Rajeev Gandhi in Loksabha while opposing the Mandal commission report implementation in 1989?

2.How many politicians actually send their children to state run educational institutes?Why all young MPs today including Scions from The Sindhias, The Pilots,The Gandhis and The Deoras are all MBA s from US universities?Were they not accepted at IIM s or just because they were "elite",they could afford the foreign education?

3.The reservations are applied for past 60 years,but still why we really can not bring the backward classes and minorities in the main stream of social India?Are reservations really effctive in building the "social bridge" ?While there was a study published in Hindustan Times which concludes that the reservations are helping the Backward communities to earn a decent livelyhood by earning professional degrees ,it has no mention about the "social divide" we still have in our society!

4.Why there are "successive" reservations?If a deserving dalit candidate is provided with assistance in his education and he attains the professional degree,then why still he has the privilage of being selected in state run corporations and PSU s under the quota system?

The quota should make the candidate worthy enough to earn his colours in his course and then compete with all in open.

5.Till what date we are extending the reservations?Forever????
It was only for 10 years after independence,but now every government for votes,extends it always!Will it stop somewhere?

Comments

Unknown said…
Chinmay,

Nice post. I am glad to see you blog on the internet. Keep it up. Regarding your post I would say its very sad that instead of spreading equality among the citizens of India our govt is spreading castism by promoting reservations. After sixty years of independance if you still have to accomodate for reservations then its not a solution but a problem to solve.

Popular posts from this blog

आय टी चे मृगजळ : काय सत्य काय असत्य !! मराठी पालकांनी करावे तरी काय ?

( प्रस्तुत लेखक स्वतः एका बहुराष्ट्रीय आय टी कम्पनी मध्ये कार्यरत असून ,या क्षेत्राचा १५ वर्षे अनुभव आहे .लेखात व्यक्त केलेली मते वैयक्तिक आहेत. काही मुद्दे कठोर भाषेत मांडले आहेत .यात कुठल्याही व्यवसायाचा अथवा व्यावसायिकाचा वैयक्तिक उपमर्द करण्याचा हेतू नाही .आपल्या मुलाला अथवा मुलीला "आय टी " क्षेत्रात पाठवायला बघत असाल तर नक्कीच वाचा आणि आपल्या पाल्याला वाचायला द्या .लेखाचा विषय तांत्रिक असल्याने जिकडे योग्य मराठी प्रमाण प्रतिशब्द मिळाले नाहीत तिकडे मूळ तांत्रिक संज्ञा वापरल्या आहेत ) आय टी  चे मृगजळ : काय सत्य काय असत्य  सध्या वर्तमानपत्र उघडले की आय टी क्षेत्रात मंदी आहे आणि हजारो लोकांचे रोजगार जाणार अश्या बातम्या दिसतात . अमेरिकेने आणि इतर देशांनी व्हिसा चे नियम कडक केले असल्याने भारतीय आय टी प्रोफेशनल्स च्या बऱ्याच संधी जाणार अशी ओरड सुद्धा दिसते . या दोन्ही मुद्द्यात नक्कीच तथ्य आहे .पण यासाठी सरसकट आय टी कम्पन्यांना किंवा अमेरिकन सरकार ला व्हिलन बनविण्याआधी काही बाबींचा सर्वांगीण परामर्श घेणे गरजेचे आहे .आपल्या आय टी क्षेत्रा बद्दलच्या क...

No attestation and stamp paper needed for any government service or affidavit respectively in Maharashtra

Central government passed this order  in Sep 2014 and now Maharashtra Government followed... Maharashtra Government in a GR Dated 09th March 2015 categorically issued orders to all state government authorities and departments that here onwards no office will ask for attestation by SEO/Gazetted officers /school or college principal on any photocopy of any document. A simple self certification from applicant is sufficient .You can sign the photocopy and that's about it Also no affidavit here onwards will be needed to be done on a stamp paper ( though this order was in place since 2003,it was not practiced and people were still paying for stamp papers )except those cases where a law categorically needs a stamped affidavit .This is very important as many government officers used to insist at their will for an affidavit on stamp paper even if standard operating procedure of the law governing that citizen service didn't specifically mention any need for such a...

Do not pay more than MRP for packaged goods

The purpose of this post is to make you aware about the law relating to maximum retail price (MRP) on packaged goods.I had put in a RTI (Right to Information ) application to Controller of Legal Metrology,Maharashtra State and requested for the information relating to various laws regarding MRP violation cases we face in day to day’s life. If anyone needs the original application which I made as well as the scanned copy of the reply I have received from Legal Metrology department,please email me on chinmay@gavankars.com . 1.It has been observed by many of us that many small shops in our locality always charge more money for essential things like milk, mineral water than the printed MRP. If you try to argue with them, then they say that extra one rupee or so is for “cooling charges” for milk or water as the case may be. Friends, this is fraud and a big offence under the weights and measures law. Charging more than MRP on item like packaged drinking water is an offence under rule 23 (2) ...